Π ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΌΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ·Ρ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π±Π°ΡΠΈ?
BY Fatal Flash π
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
A project of our size needs at least a few hundred million dollars per year to keep going,β Mr. Durov wrote in his public channel on Telegram late last year. βWhile doing that, we will remain independent and stay true to our values, redefining how a tech company should operate.
οΈΠΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°οΈ from us